tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9070755194464338379.post3244515781134941092..comments2009-07-06T14:51:00.145-06:00Binghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09911928552839958713noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9070755194464338379.post-80501903076191573322009-07-06T14:51:00.145-06:002009-07-06T14:51:00.145-06:00Bravo and well said. I love your rants!<br /><br />The idea that fruitcakes like this can spew out a huge amount of science-sounding words and think they have demonstrated anything other than their own stupidity will never cease to amaze me.Thttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14814027590338592424noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9070755194464338379.post-49924544098221057792009-07-05T11:14:35.917-06:002009-07-05T11:14:35.917-06:00Unless I&#39;m terribly mistaken (which, glancing at past experience, is a possibility), you forgot to <a href="http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2009/07/03/feedback-the-limits-of-science" rel="nofollow">link</a> to the page in question.<br />...<br /><i>&quot;Let&#39;s say you throw a dead jackrabbit and a copy of Ken Ham&#39;s new book (Why I Like to Do It With Girls) out off of a bridge at the same time. They will accelerate at the same speed and hit the ground simultaneously, regardless of whether anyone sees or believes it. &quot;</i><br />To be accurate, that should mention &quot;in a vacuum&quot;. The speed of two objects dropped simultaneously in a medium other than vacuum varies due to drag (as illustrated by feather v rock).Modusoperandihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04213914791604385761noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9070755194464338379.post-55632923472903146702009-07-05T04:18:28.281-06:002009-07-05T04:18:28.281-06:00Wow, Ken Ham is republishing old fictional Oscar Wilde pamphlets? He never ceases to amaze me.Muffinmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12600832714675867721noreply@blogger.com