What to write about tonight? It was a close call.
I had two options. The first was from Health Twat Mike Adams, who sent me a paranoid screed about Bill Gates, who is secretly trying to sterilize and vaccinate you. No, cock-failure, he's openly trying to vaccinate you, and how, in the ever-loving name of my left nut (Ted...he's not talking to Bill right now) could you possibly surreptitiously blast a man's scrotum with ultrasound? Whatever. If it becomes a non-invasive elective treatment, cool beans. Enjoy your blanks.
There is a simple reason why the gay rights lobby is trying to rush through repeal of the Pentagon's homosexual exclusion policy. They know that a comprehensive review of a proposed change would disclose the substantial evidence that admission of open and active homosexuals would put our troops in further danger through exposure to tainted blood. In fact, evidence to this effect is already in the hands of top military commanders and Pentagon officers.OH SHIT! THEY BETTER WASH THEIR HANDS OR THEY WILL GET THE AIDS!
The Pentagon understands that 19,000 soldiers already have HIV/AIDS and that some -- if not most -- came down with the deadly disease through prohibited gay sexual conduct. It is common sense that opening the ranks to open and active homosexuals would only increase this problem.
Here's another critical fact that a comprehensive review would disclose --there is no blood test that can be guaranteed to screen HIV and other deadly diseases out of the blood supply once the gay males, who are currently prohibited from donating blood, are welcomed into the services.
Meantime, Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council reports in a blockbuster new study that the evidence indicates that a disproportionate number of assaults in the military are committed by homosexuals.
The evidence, in short, already demonstrates a significant problem of homosexual misconduct in the Armed Forces, even though such behavior is supposed to be prohibited.
Oblivious to the demonstrated need to tighten up rather than loosen the current policy, the Washington Post has editorialized in favor of a quick congressional vote, saying it is "reprehensible" to keep homosexuals out of the military. One of the Post's leading editorial writers, Jonathan Capehart, is a homosexual activist who used to cover gay sex clubs.
The gay rights lobby is labeling as "offensive" a new video that exposes homosexual misconduct in the Armed Forces and wants it taken down from YouTube. They have not pinpointed one factual inaccuracy in the film or in the heavily documented 60-page report by Dale O'Leary that forms the basis of it.
In a new blockbuster 60-page report that could affect the on-going debate over gays in the military, writer and researcher Dale O'Leary documents why the proposed admission of open and active homosexuals -- and other persons with various "gender identity" problems and disorders -- threatens and would undermine the military culture.
The report, "Asking for Trouble: How Admitting Open Homosexuals to the U.S. Armed Forces Will Undermine Military Readiness, Order, and Discipline," has been issued by the public policy group, America's Survival, Inc., headed by veteran journalist Cliff Kincaid.

Their desperation is being guided by the realization that male homosexual conduct is directly linked to tainted blood and deadly diseases such as HIV/AIDS, and that no cure or vaccine has yet been found.What does it say about your desperation that you resort to making up other people to agree with you, you squid-licking monkey scrotum?
They don't want the public to learn about cases such as Johnnie Lamar Dalton, a soldier who came down with HIV and then infected a boy he met in a gay online chat room. Dalton went to prison, but homosexuals in the Armed Forces coming down with HIV/AIDS cost at least $18,000-$20,000 a year per patient.
A comprehensive review, which would also take into account the views of our soldiers currently fighting two wars, was promised to our troops before any legislative action was to be taken. The comprehensive review was to be completed by December and was part of the questionable deal that Defense Secretary Robert Gates made in order to accommodate President Obama's irresponsible campaign pledge to admit open gays, no matter what the consequences to military readiness, order, and discipline.
The gays and their allies, however, don't care about the troops. They want their "rights" and they want them now. They simply don't care if a premature policy change causes thousands of our soldiers to leave the Armed Forces in disgust and dismay and thousands more never to sign up because they don't want to room or shower with individuals sexually attracted to them.









1 comments:
may i add- DADT is cleverly written so as to allow married heterosexuals who are found to have had gay sex to simply say 'my bad, I'm married so I must be straight, and it won't happen again...' So with DOMA, the same marriage certificate that proves one person is gay (issued in MA, etc.) and must be discharged from military service, is a get out of free card for teh straights. boo-yah. only in Amerika.
Post a Comment