The saddest thing I ever saw...
I went back to where the IIG Preliminary for Anita Ikonen took place (she failed) to see if there was anyone left in the chat, hours later. There wasn't but the last thing that I saw was this.
10:31 ustreamer-15131: Hello anyone still out here! This is Anita Ikonen/VFF!Get used to it, Anita. Oh, and getting 1/3 correct is not 50/50, idiot. You suck at math and seeing kidneys (yes, that's her claimed power).
10:31 ustreamer-15131: Thank you for watching my test! It was fun, everything went well, and I can't wait to post the notes and final conclusions!
10:32 ustreamer-15131: The first and third trials were hard, I was not sure on them. The second trial I was sure of, and it was correct. All of my thoughts are in the papers I handed in to James Underdown.
10:33 ustreamer-15131: Either way, however, I failed the IIG Preliminary.
10:33 ustreamer-15131: But I feel like I got 50% correct, and 50% incorrect. So where do I go from there?
10:33 ustreamer-15131: This is VFF/Anita!
10:33 ustreamer-15131: No one here anymore.
HJ
Seed Newsvine
2 comments:
funny/sad .. .
..
.ero
Nothing sad about engaging in a test with the Independent Investigations Group and failing by my own accord. The test was arranged and conducted by the IIG far beyond my expectations, it was professionally done and reliable.
And if you think failing at a scientific investigation is sad, then you are lucky to not work within the field of science, because all we are interested in is reliable results, and failure is part of scientific progress.
I am happy. Not sad.
Post a Comment