Here comes the crazy...

The first of the usual disappointments has, well, not disappointed. Bill Wilson dropped this trouser dumpling over at Bible Prophecy today regarding the Nobel Peace Prize that went to Obama:

And the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize goes to - drum roll please - the man who occupies the Oval Office. Yes, you read me right, OOO has won the Nobel Peace Prize. April Fools Day has come six months early for some, six months late for others. The Nobel prize is now officially on the list of grand political jokes. They say he won it because of reaching out to the Muslim world, banning interrogation techniques that might be considered torture, promoting peace by bringing a new global monetary policy to the nations, and deciding not to deploy missiles in Europe. He also has made a public commitment to end the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Did you even bother to read the announcement? Multilateralism + nuclear disarmament. Why do you even bother pretending to have done your homework? I often ask this of my less talented and unmotivated students.

But Americans may find OOO's actions far less peace oriented. Perhaps a new name for the Nobel prize is in order - the Nobel Appeasement Prize.

You suck at sarcasm. More than most people.

If this were the case, OOO would win hands down in a way that would engender an all-knowing smile from Neville Chamberlain emanating from his eternal post in the depths of the pit of Hades.

WOAH! Big slam on Neville Chamberlain!

What follows from there is a series of unconnected thoughts that might well have been cobbled together extemporaneously by the insane. Seriously, substitute Muslim for "terrorist" in this following passage and tell me that Bill Wilson's ideal president would not be killing or torturing as many Muslims worldwide as humanly possible:

Appeasing the Muslim world with a landmark speech in Cairo to a bulk group of terrorists and terrorist sympathizers; extending the olive branch to the world's foremost sponsor of terrorism in Iran; threatening the peace loving state of Israel that its American ally's efforts against Iranian nuclear proliferation is tied directly to Israel's acceptance of a Palestinian terrorist state; releasing terrorists into society by closing the terrorist prison in Cuba; restoring diplomatic relations with the second foremost sponsor of terrorism, Syria; scuttling a planned defensive missile program in Poland and the Czech Republic that was designed to defend against a future terrorist missile launch from Iran; Ignoring general's advice by understaffing the military in Afghanistan while brave American soldiers are dying in increasing attacks by terrorists; yielding the sovereignty of the American economy to the International Monetary Fund; supporting a dictator for life wannabe in Honduras over its Constitutional Republic; banning mission critical terrorist identification and tracking techniques...

See? Pure batshit. Eventually, "terrorist" loses its rhetorical punch when you refer to every swarthy person as a terrorist.

As an American, I do not feel too peaceful about the actions of this administration. Sources I have interviewed who are involved or were involved in national security say that the Islamic terrorist network is emboldened by the actions of this White House and that by banning some very critical terrorist monitoring practices, it is now not a question of "if" a terrorist strike will occur on American soil, but "when."

I refuse to believe that this misshapen doofus has "access," for a couple of reasons. 1) There is more than one Islamist terrorist network. 2) He claims to somehow have access (either directly or indirectly) to the mind of people plotting against American interests. If you had useful information you would tell us when, I mean unless you are with the terrorists. Heehee. 3) It was always "when" it will happen again. However, I think that it will be easier for Americans who "do not feel too peaceful about the actions of this administration" to do something awful. I think the Americans will strike first, actually.

The question of King David should be welling up in every American's heart from Psalm 94:16,

"Who will rise up for me against the evildoers? Or who will stand up for me against the workers of iniquity?"

Appeasement is not peace. And only fools believe peace is about giving in or siding with evil.

So, by "rise up" you mean what exactly? Are you threatening the President? Seriously, watch your fucking lip, you incautious man-child.

HJ